Medical Advocates for Social Justice
Conference Abstract



1st International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Buenos Aires, Argentina - 
July 8 - July 11, 2001

Comparison of the Emergence of Genotypic Resistance over 60 Weeks of Therapy with Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) or Nelfinavir plus d4T/3TC. D Kempf*, B Bernstein, M King, P Cernohous, J Moseley, K Gu, E Bauer and E Sun. 

Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL USA


Share this Abstract with a Colleague                     Kaletra Library Service                     Home

Background: Study M98-863 is a randomized, double-blind Phase III study of 653 ARV-naïve subjects treated with either Kaletra or nelfinavir (NFV), in combination with d4T/3TC. In an on treatment analysis at Week 48, 93% of subjects in the Kaletra group vs. 82% in the NFV group had HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml (p< 0.001). 58 Kaletra treated and 102 NFV treated subjects had HIV RNA >400 copies/mL at Week 24, 32, 40 or 48.   

Methods: Resistance testing results were available for 37/58 Kaletra and 76/102 NFV-treated subjects. Resistance to Kaletra was defined as the appearance of any primary or active site mutation in protease, and was confirmed by phenotypic analysis. Resistance to NFV was defined as the appearance of the D30N and/or L90M mutations. 3TC resistance was defined as the presence of the M184V or I mutation in RT, 

Results: No evidence (0/37) of genotypic resistance to Kaletra was observed in any of these isolates from Kaletra-treated subjects through Week 48. In contrast, 25/76 (33%) of isolates from NFV-treated subjects displayed evidence of genotypic resistance to NFV (p<0.001 for the comparison between treatment arms). Subsequent to genotypic analysis, 26 Kaletra-treated subjects and 53 NFV-treated subjects had an HIV RNA determination. 22/26 (86%) Kaletra-treated subjects experienced resuppression (or initial suppression) to <400 copies/mL compared to only 17/53 (32%) NFV-treated subjects (p<0.001).  3TC resistance was noted in 15/37(41%) of Kaletra-treated subjects and 62/76 (82%) NFV-treated subjects (p<0.001). 

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the duration or level of detectable viremia, or in adherence (as measured by pill counts), between treatment arms in the subjects with available genotype. These results suggest that the genetic barrier to resistance to Kaletra in treatment-naïve subjects is higher than the barrier to NFV resistance. Data through Week 60 will be presented.

TOP


 

   
Abstract 
 Comparison of the Emergence of Genotypic Resistance over 60 Weeks of Therapy with Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) or Nelfinavir plus d4T/3TC