Medical Advocates for Social Justice
Conference Abstract
from the
XII International HIV Drug Resistance Workshop

Los Cabos, Mexico   
June 10-14, 2003

 

 

The Relationship between Susceptibility to Enfuvirtide of
Baseline Viral Recombinants and Polymorphisms in the
Env Region of R5-tropic HIV-1

C. Su1, G. Heilek-Snyder1, D. Fenger1, P. Ravindran1,
K. Tsai1, N. Cammack1, P. Sista2, S. Chiu1

1Roche, Palo Alto, CA, USA;
2Trimeris, Inc., Durham, NC, USA

 

Share this Abstract with a Colleague 

 

Background:
Whilst it is evident that the principal determinants for reduced Enfuvirtide (ENF) susceptibility reside in HIV-1 gp41, the possibility remains that other determinants within baseline (BL) HIV-1 envelope amino acid sequences may also influence ENF susceptibility for virus from Fusion Inhibitor naïve patients.  We explored such relationships by further mining the TORO 1 and TORO 2 clinical trial databases using univariate and multivariate statistical methods.

Methods:
Paired BL genotype and phenotype data were analyzed for 377 R5 tropic recombinants from patients receiving ENF and an optimized background regimen.  HIV-1 envelope (complete gp160) amino acid sequences and ENF susceptibility were generated using the GeneSeqTM and PhenoSenseTM HIV Entry assays.  The relationship of genotype (JRCSF reference) and phenotype at each individual gp160 position was explored using analysis of variance (ANOVA) models.  The joint relationship between the entire  gp160 sequence and ENF susceptibility was studied using cluster analysis and regression tree modeling.

Results:
The fold change in IC50 was approximately log-normally distributed with a geometric mean (GM) of 1.58 (range 0.04–37.71) and a standard deviation of 2.64.  ANOVA identified “important” amino acids (p-value<0.05) in both gp41 (e.g., G3GT, N42S and V69L) and gp120 (e.g., T50I and L444M) that were all associated with >1.5 fold change in susceptibility from the GM.  To explore differences among gp41 genotypes, cluster analysis was used to identify two clusters of 365 (Cluster 1) and 12 (Cluster 2) recombinants.  Recombinants in Cluster 2 were identified as non-B subtypes.  Cluster 2 (GM=0.78, range 0.04–4.44) showed a higher ENF susceptibility (p-value=0.01) than Cluster 1 (GM=1.61, range 0.05–37.71); Cluster 1 had a GM and range similar to the complete dataset.  Recombinants in Cluster 2 had higher frequencies of the polymorphisms N42S, E151A, N305D and T130T, which were associated with increased ENF susceptibility.  Additionally, the clusters were compared using Week 24 efficacy data; patients in Cluster 2 experienced a larger drop in VL than patients in Cluster 1.  To further explore the genotype and phenotype relationship, binary regression tree models were constructed.  The optimized tree contained five terminal nodes.  Tree branch points occurred at gp41 positions 3ins (insertion at 3), 24 and 42, which also appeared in the “important” amino acid set obtained by ANOVA.

Conclusions:
Statistical analyses have revealed an association between polymorphic sites in HIV Env and baseline variability of ENF susceptibility in HIV-1 R5 tropic recombinants.  Cluster analysis of gp41 viral sequences identified combinations of polymorphisms that were associated with higher ENF susceptibility in the 12 non-B R5 recombinants and a regression tree model illustrated amino acid interactions associated with ENF susceptibility.   The significance of these associations are under study. 


Main New/Newsworthy Enfuvirtide Main Page Los Cabos Index      

The Relationship between Susceptibility to Enfuvirtide of
Baseline Viral Recombinants and Polymorphisms in the Env Region of R5-tropic HIV-1

A Medical Advocates for Social Justice Update